« Every public school classroom in Louisiana has been
ordered to display a poster of the Ten
Commandments »
Leaving aside the objection that this infringes the principle
of the Separation of State and Religion, the edict is symptomatic of the
simple-mindedness of contemporary North American Christian culture. It
is something one could not imagine in Israel, despite the said
Commandments being integral to the Jewish Torah.
A reminder: The first three Commandments are about a Supreme
Being, and the fourth about observing a day of rest, therefore
implicitly advocating a six-day working week. The others are about
relationships with other people. Of these two (6 and 8) are fundamental
to the Common Law (no stealing or murder). One (9) prohibits lying about
neighbors, at least not in court (so implicitly many other lies are
permitted). One (10) is against envy, which is the cornerstone of
consumerist society and intrusive advertising. Two (5 and 7) uphold a
narrow concept of family life.
Those of us who do not study ancient Hebrew may puzzle about
the translation or how the traditional English wording is to be
understood. For example, we might wonder how “false witness” should be
interpreted. I doubt many of the target public schoolchildren or
youngsters are able to appreciate, or are encouraged to learn, such
subtleties.
Bracketing out the religious parts, my objection is that the
Commandments are not presented as default positions, but as absolutes,
i.e. without exceptions. This reduces morality to the observance of
rules, with priority given to these particular ones. Morality is not
taught in terms of the development of good character and judgement.
There is moreover no contextualisation.
The Commandments were for tribal coherence in a world we can
hardly imagine. The prohibition on murder, or killing, did not,
presumably, apply to hostile or even innocent members of neighboring
tribes, and it was certainly understood that killing animals was kosher.
Does Commandment 6 cover euthanasia, abortion, neglect & exposure of
newborn, or suicide? I think not.
My contention goes further. It might be argued that the
Commandments do at least supply a beginning. They do not. They set the
compass wrong. If in North America you want to travel south and
constantly see the sun rising to your right, do not console yourself
that you have made a first step. Start over.
A useful opening in speaking not only to children is to
examine the principles of truth-telling and not telling
lies.
The better part of virtue is discretion. Children are taught
to tell “white” lies. And not to snitch on classmates.
There are several aspects to reflect on with regard to
truth-telling. One is to examine the standing of the recipients. Does
the addressee of whatever is told deserve, or have a right, to hear the
truth? Truth on demand? Might a lie be needed to shield people worthy of
protection? Is this the right moment for truth to be told? Will it be
understood, or believed, as intended, or, rather, be misinterpreted?
Might not a lie or concealment now be corrected later, when the time is
propitious? (These questions are for a personal context. They may need
adaptation to underscore the priority of truth in public office.)
Commandment 7, the one against adultery, is based on the
principle, not of love, but of exclusive possession of another person.
It is pernicious and corrosive. To quote Pasternak “Failure to love is
almost like murder.” Read my seminal 1984 essay “Against Couples” at http://www.thinking-for-clarity.de/family.html
A better moral code has a contrary structure, at best
recommending default positions which must sometimes be
reversed.
As a heterosexual man I am forbidden, however tempted, to
sexually touch unknown women, for example, in a crowded space, but there
are other (all-too-rare) situations where, when invited, it is
imperative to make advances. “Failure to love is almost like murder.”
(This said, the erotic sphere is inherently ambiguous, being defined by
ambivalence, markedly different to other spheres.)
Morality must be taught as treating the need to act, and not
only to refrain, as too it must encompass the cultivation of judgement
and good character. Bad things happen when good men stay silent.
Morality is also about holding others to account. The “Ten Commandments”
poster can only suppress or delay such lessons and
insights. |